ellipsis flag icon-blogicon-check icon-comments icon-email icon-error icon-facebook icon-follow-comment icon-googleicon-hamburger icon-imedia-blog icon-imediaicon-instagramicon-left-arrow icon-linked-in icon-linked icon-linkedin icon-multi-page-view icon-person icon-print icon-right-arrow icon-save icon-searchicon-share-arrow icon-single-page-view icon-tag icon-twitter icon-unfollow icon-upload icon-valid icon-video-play icon-views icon-website icon-youtubelogo-imedia-white logo-imedia logo-mediaWhite review-star thumbs_down thumbs_up

When Users Post, Do Advertisers Pay?

Terri Seligman
When Users Post, Do Advertisers Pay? Terri Seligman

Advertisers who target a teenage and young adult demographic often seek to exploit the latest online phenomenon. As marketers know, the phenomenon of the moment is user-generated content and websites that feature it, such as MySpace and YouTube. Such sites enable users to post content that others can read, listen to, view and download, and both have social networking features that allow users to comment on the content. 

Some of the content that is posted to and downloaded from these sites could lead to lawsuits against the website operators, the creators of such content, and those who post the content to the site. Potential claims include copyright and trademark infringement, defamation, and invasion of the rights to privacy and publicity.

An important question for advertisers is whether they could be liable for any of these claims when they place their ads on sites featuring user-generated content, whether by making an ad buy or simply posting their ads on the sites. This article discusses theories of liability for copyright infringement and defamation, whether an advertiser could be liable for either claim, and steps an advertiser can take to reduce the risk of liability.

Next: Copyright infringement

Copyright infringement
Tips for advertisers

It has been well established by the courts that when someone posts copyrighted material to a website, without the permission of the copyright owner, that person is liable for copyright infringement. 

Copyright law also recognizes that someone who facilitates copyright infringement -- without actually being the one who is directly copying or distributing the work, for example -- can also be liable for infringement. There are two theories of so-called secondary infringement: contributory infringement and vicarious infringement. To be liable for contributory infringement, a person must have knowledge of the infringing activity and induce, cause or materially contribute to the infringing conduct. 

To be liable for vicarious copyright infringement, a person must have the right and ability to supervise the infringing activity and must have a financial interest in the exploitation of the copyrighted work. Note that to be liable for vicarious copyright infringement, a person does not need to have knowledge of the infringing activity.

Copyright owners have successfully used these theories of secondary infringement to go after operators of peer-to-peer file sharing networks such as Napster and Grokster. However, so far, courts in the United States have not addressed whether an advertiser could be liable for contributory or vicarious copyright infringement if it advertises on a website that makes infringing material available.

Previous: Introduction          Next: Defamation

Copyright infringement
Tips for advertisers

Can an advertiser be liable for a defamation claim stemming from user-generated content when the advertiser's ad is in or near the content, such as a blog? It probably depends on whether an advertiser would be considered a publisher of the defamatory statement contained in the blog.

In the "old media" world, publishers and distributors can be held liable for publishing or selling materials that contain defamatory statements written by someone else. But there is a federal law -- Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act -- that shields online publishers from liability for defamation and certain other torts committed by someone else. This law states that "no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."

Many companies and individuals, from AOL to online newspaper publishers to bloggers, have successfully used this provision to avoid liability for defamation. But since courts have not addressed whether section 230 would apply to an advertiser, it is not known whether an advertiser would be protected by this law.

Previous: Copyright infringement          Next: Tips for advertisers

Copyright Infringement
Tips for advertisers

Advertisers who are interested in advertising on websites that provide access to user-generated content can take some steps to reduce their potential risk of liability:

  • When making an ad buy on a site featuring user-generated content, do not select a specific location for your ads, unless you know that location contains only non-infringing material

  • Do not embed your ads in user-created videos unless you are certain the videos do not contain any infringing material (this includes music used in the video) or defamatory content

  • Do not induce or encourage the downloading of specific videos unless you are certain such videos do not contain any infringing or defamatory material

  • Do not advertise on a site that flaunts access to material that is obviously published without permission of the copyright owners

  • Do your own due diligence of the sites where you intend to advertise; do not rely on indemnities from the website owners as a substitute for scrutiny of their content.

In my next article, I will address advertisers' (and their agencies') use of user-generated content on their own websites.

Terri Seligman is a partner in the Advertising and Promotions Law Group at Loeb & Loeb LLP. Read full bio. Jill Westmoreland contributed to this article.


to leave comments.