ellipsis flag icon-blogicon-check icon-comments icon-email icon-error icon-facebook icon-follow-comment icon-googleicon-hamburger icon-imedia-blog icon-imediaicon-instagramicon-left-arrow icon-linked-in icon-linked icon-linkedin icon-multi-page-view icon-person icon-print icon-right-arrow icon-save icon-searchicon-share-arrow icon-single-page-view icon-tag icon-twitter icon-unfollow icon-upload icon-valid icon-video-play icon-views icon-website icon-youtubelogo-imedia-white logo-imedia logo-mediaWhite review-star thumbs_down thumbs_up

"Cheap" SEO tricks and how to use them

"Cheap" SEO tricks and how to use them Tom Crandall

Old school best practices for writing brand marketing copy have included the omission of terms that may reflect poorly on a company, including the term "cheap" to describe a product or service.

But is this practical in the world of SEO? In these seemingly dire economic times, search volume for phrases that include the term "cheap" has spiked. In an iMedia article published last May, Craig Macdonald at Covario cited comScore research (from December 2007) indicating the search phrase "cheap airfare" alone is worth about $8 million.

According to the Google AdWords Keyword Tool, the average monthly search volume for the phrase "cheap insurance" typically amounts to 673,000 queries. Last month, the number of queries for this term rocketed to 2.7 million. Likewise, the average monthly search volume for the phrase "cheap car" is traditionally about 1 million queries. Last month, the volume exceeded 3.3 million.

So, as you consider incorporating adjectives such as "affordable," "budget," "inexpensive," "low-cost," and "thrifty" into your SEO strategies, consider this: There is a growing number of brands weaving the keyword "cheap" into their on-page SEO elements. (Many are even incorporating this term into their marketing copy!)

Let's take a look at some of the brands that are capitalizing on the word "cheap" in their SEO strategies. Could your organization benefit from giving this previously taboo word some renewed consideration?

Take a look at this Google search results page for "cheap hotels."

The phrase "cheap hotels" is an extremely competitive keyword set, and Red Roof Inn is the only budget-conscious lodging brand that appears in a sea of aggregators. Kudos to Red Roof CEO Joe Wheeling and digital agency 360i for applying common sense. After just a few weeks of becoming the digital agency of record for Red Roof Inn, the title tag for the company's home page went from this:

Red Roof Inn

to this:

RedRoof Inn | Cheap Hotels - Discount Hotels - Hotel Reservations - Hotel Rooms

Viewing the page source, we can see that Red Roof Inn is utilizing the term "cheap" in the title tag and description tag:

Red Roof Inn | Cheap Hotels - Discount Hotels - Hotel Reservations - Hotel Rooms

In short, by embracing the word "cheap," Red Roof Inn has increased its chances of connecting with consumers who are searching for low-cost travel accommodations. 

As with hotels, competition for the keyword set "cheap rental car" is thick. As you can see on the below screenshot, the first ad displayed for this term, by aggregator CarRentals.com, offers daily rentals for seven major car rental brands as low as $8.98 a day. When I searched the company's database for the cheapest advertised rates on its homepage, the touted deal turned out to be a sham.

For example, the company's homepage boasts a daily rate of $7.43 at LAX from Feb. 28 to March 14. When I searched for the cheapest rate within the dates advertised, the lowest rate offered was $26 per day on a weekly rental through Deluxe Rent A Car. The same held true for every special offer I searched. Regardless, this bait-and-switch tactic may convert a fair amount of business for CarRentals.com because the customer is already on its website and just wants to book a reservation without further delay or frustration.

One brand that has no qualms about positioning itself for the "cheap car rental" niche is Fox Car Rental. Fox Car Rental uses its title tags, description tags, keyword tags, and homepage marketing copy to optimize for "cheap car rental," "cheap car rentals," and "cheap car rental rates."

Here's the Google search results page for "cheap car rental."

On its homepage, Fox Car Rental advertises a low rate of $12 per day in Phoenix, March 17 through March 20, and it comes through with the offer, available for both compact and economy models.

Moving on to "cheap airfare," who comes to mind? I think of Southwest Airlines, Air Tran Airways, and Frontier Airlines. However, I found only one brand ranking on the first page of Google for the term "cheap airfare" -- Spirit Airlines. The company optimizes its homepage for "cheap tickets," "cheap flights," "discount airfare," "cheap hotels," "cheap car rentals," and "cheap travel."

Ironically, the unlikely airline brand to feature the best on-page optimization for frequently searched keyword sets that contain the term "cheap" is American Airlines. Strategically, this is a great move.

This AA.com page is optimized for "cheap flights," "cheap travel deals," and "cheap air fare." The company increases the thematic relevance (a Google best practice) by weaving in synonymous text in the marketing copy such as "sales," "deals," "values," "discounts," and "special offers." The Google terminology for how synonyms affect the search engine results of web pages is called "latent semantic indexing," and Jeffrey Smith of SEO Design Solutions reveals a sweet little tactic to identify synonyms in the eyes of Google in this blog post.

Despite all this effort, AA.com drops the ball by serving pages with dynamic URLs, thereby preventing them from ranking in Google. I can't stress enough to brand marketers and virtual IT techs how important it is to rewrite dynamic URLs to appear static to the search engine robots. Search-engine-friendly URLs will make or break your search engine rankings, and AA.com fails to rewrite the URLs for its JavaServer Pages (JSP).

One other note here: AA.com's audience searches for "airfare," not "air fare."

When it comes to optimizing for the term "cheap," I have one more example that I would describe as a "trick" tactic. Let's take a look at the results in Google for the search "cheap hotels Phoenix."

The results for the geo-targeted keyword set "cheap hotels Phoenix" reveals a sneaky (i.e., deceiving) tactic employed by "Palmer Lux Hotel."

The people behind this site created a Google Maps business listing with the name Cheap Hotels Phoenix. Hmmm. I live in Phoenix and have never heard of this little gem, so I decided to check out the details.

As it turns out, the hotel does not exist. It is a "cheap trick" to generate hotel searches for the aggregator Hotelscombined.com. Here is the fine print:

"This Web site, its domain and all photos and images within the site do NOT represent an actual hotel. The purpose of this site is to provide the user with the lowest hotel rates from across top travel sites aggregated from www.HotelsCombined.com."

With so much competition in the travel industry, we will continue to see more brands optimize their services for the term "cheap." Does this -- as many marketers have traditionally argued -- damage brand perception and curb profitability? In this economic climate, high search volumes for phrases that include the term "cheap" might indicate otherwise.

Tom Crandall is the author of SEM Report Card and CEO of Ayohwahr Interactive.

Tom Crandall is the managing partner and lead consultant for Tom Crandall & Associates, and the author of SEM Report Card. Tom’s firm provides consulting and agency services for brands with a local business model, including corporate...

View full biography


to leave comments.

Commenter: dinesh janigd

2010, September 19

hi i am dinesh.this site is very very nice. i like it
Cheap Hotels Bedford-Cheap Hotels Bedford

Commenter: dinesh janigd

2010, September 19

i am dines,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Good stuff...How does one get away with using cheap in the real estate market? We don't want to make a property seem less desirable. My word has always been less expensive. Your thougths.
Cheap Hotels Bedford-Cheap Hotels Bedford

Commenter: dinesh janigd

2010, September 19

hi i am dinesh.this site is very very nice. i like it
Cheap Hotels Bedford-Cheap Hotels Bedford

Commenter: Daniel B

2010, February 09

I've noticed something about "cheap" on google webmaster tools. It simply doesn't appear as one of my keywords for my site. I'm wondering if that doesn't indicate that somehow "cheap" is being ignored by google.

It could explain why I've been having exceptional trouble getting my site targetting "cheap" to climb the ratings.

Commenter: cheap domain

2009, August 29

i think google start to ignore keywords like cheap and inexpensive. read more about google seo in my blog at http://www.cheapdomainnamesdot.com/domain-blog/

Commenter: Mike Carpino

2009, March 29

Good stuff...How does one get away with using cheap in the real estate market? We don't want to make a property seem less desirable. My word has always been less expensive. Your thougths.

Commenter: Tom Crandall

2009, March 24

Eddy, you are correct--Google can and does index dynamic pages. I didn't articulate otherwise. I stated that dynamic URL's prevent the AA.com web page from ranking in Google for desired keyword sets such as "cheap flights" (included in the title tag and header of the web page identified in my screenshot).

I would discourage brand managers/leadership from using the number of dynamic pages indexed in Google as a KPI to measure success. A better approach is to monitor visibility for branded and non-branded searches, assess click-through success, and ultimately the conversion rates of desired actions.

There are additional benefits to rewriting URL's as well. Take a look at these two URL's:




Which URL looks more relevant for the search "engagement rings?” Which URL looks more trustworthy? Which will get a higher CTR? Which URL's keywords will be emboldened in the SERP snippet?

Another argument for URL rewrites is to avoid duplicate content. Another is to ensure the flow of PageRank (link juice) throughout all levels of your website (from pages to sub-pages).

The dynamic URL Kay Jewelers currently publishes for their Engagement Ring category page (the first URL above) is never going to rank at the top of Google for the search "engagement rings.” URL's are that important to SEO, especially when optimizing for competitive, non-branded keyword sets.

Commenter: Eddy Gonzalez

2009, March 24

Useful and interesting article.

On the point about AA.com though, Google can and does index dynamic pages if, as in the case of AA.com there are direct links to that dynamic content.
A quick search on Google shows that GoogleBot has indexed hundreds of dynamic pages on the AA site, and interestingly through static URLs like this one, www.aa.com/hotspots.

Commenter: Jose Amoros

2009, March 23

Fantastic insight and better post.
Specially dued to this economic downturn the number of searches have been multiplied by far.

As the number ot chained words when making a seach has been increased to at least 5 ,theese two word searches are getting so much competitive.

As a SEO consultant myself, I will add that organic results are a long term investment compared to the high cost that a competitive PPC word can get.

Commenter: Susan Kuchinskas

2009, March 23

In addition to this smart re-thinking of how we're viewing the word "cheap" these days, this article makes two important points:

First, especially in the travel category, scammy aggregators have tainted natural search results (which only makes the ppc results more valuable -- and more expensive). Second, brands can and should use SEO to take back their place in the organic results.

Commenter: Michael Hong

2009, March 23

This is a great insight on digital customer. We need to address what customer wants hear rather than what we want customer to hear. This is a good strategy even for premium brands. At times when economy is soft, even the premium brand have a price driven products and they need to make sure they get the fare share of traffic to their messages.

Commenter: Anil Kumar Singh

2009, March 23

Excellent post.