ellipsis flag icon-blogicon-check icon-comments icon-email icon-error icon-facebook icon-follow-comment icon-googleicon-hamburger icon-imedia-blog icon-imediaicon-instagramicon-left-arrow icon-linked-in icon-linked icon-linkedin icon-multi-page-view icon-person icon-print icon-right-arrow icon-save icon-searchicon-share-arrow icon-single-page-view icon-tag icon-twitter icon-unfollow icon-upload icon-valid icon-video-play icon-views icon-website icon-youtubelogo-imedia-white logo-imedia logo-mediaWhite review-star thumbs_down thumbs_up

Destructive marketing habits of major brands

Kyle Montero
Destructive marketing habits of major brands Kyle Montero

Brands inevitably develop bad habits if they fail to continuously consider the consumer's perspective. The sheer number of tools available can convolute the industry, so it becomes easy to copy others who've seen success with certain tactics while failing to ask the critical question, "What will this actually do for my brand?" Commonly, the pressure to adopt shiny new methods can force marketers to forego strategic thinking in favor of a potential quick fix. On the other hand, time-tested marketing tactics must be regularly reevaluated to ensure continued efficiency.

Destructive marketing habits of major brands

The line between good and bad marketing practices can be very thin. If you're not effectively measuring your efforts, what you think is benefiting your brand may actually be having an insidious effect. The following is a look at damaging marketing behavior that even the most dominant brands develop. Interestingly, these habits evolved after embracing some of the most valuable marketing tools today. Do any of these behaviors look a little too familiar to you?

Oversharing on social

To say the least, creating deep social connections with consumers isn't easy. As a brand, though your fans and followers have agreed to receive your content, you are still a brand, regardless of the human beings managing your social presence. Consequently, connecting with individuals without driving them away is a major challenge. Brands are under high levels of scrutiny, so it's crucial for companies to circulate more useful, entertaining, or interactive messages than posts created from a sales perspective. Even if you are able to do so, a simple mistake can sabotage your entire efforts. That mistake is oversharing. But how does a brand know if they are oversharing on social?

For the sake of this argument, we'll examine two types of oversharing: excessive posting and lengthy content. First, let's look at content length, specifically on Facebook. According to Jeff Bullas, referencing his study on retail brands, wall posts fewer than 80 characters gained 66 percent higher engagement than lengthier posts. Additionally, posts between one and 40 characters receive 86 percent higher engagement from fans. Clearly, consumers love brevity when it comes to sharing. So, what does it look like when a brand violates this golden rule?

Consider the following posts from Rite Aid, published three days apart on the topic of Valentine's Day. Specifically, examine the engagement seen through "likes," comments, and shares.

The February 14 post is short and sweet, consisting of 54 characters which comprise a simple call to action. In contrast, the February 11 message contains three sentences of 221 characters and a call to action buried deep within the text. Sure, "sharing" is an easier task than uploading a photo, but higher engagement would have likely come from solely posting the concise sentence, "Upload a photo of your kid's homemade valentine here."

On the other hand, posting too often is another way to shoot oneself in the foot. For three months, Socialbakers analyzed the content from Facebook's top brands and concluded that brands should typically post no more than once a day. Furthermore, if brands post fewer than two times a week, they may fail to maintain connections with fans. However, posting more than two times a day leads to engagement loss as well. To understand the significance of keeping one's posts rare, check out the sheer amount of "likes," shares, and comments accumulated on Oreo's Facebook page for content published five days apart.

In addition, Socialbakers studied brand tweets and found that the average engagement rate declined after the third tweet of the day. Consequently, three or fewer tweets create the most engagement for brands; however, brands are still inundating followers with an onslaught of Twitter messages.

All the same, social marketing is extremely complex. It's possible for oversharing brands to establish deep, long-lasting connections with their fans and followers. Obviously, the more a brand posts and tweets, the more chances consumers have to engage, which makes oversharing an easy habit to develop. However, the power of one meaningful social message is diluted when consumers are overwhelmed by a sea of your brand's content. By following simple guidelines regarding frequency and length, brands can maximize the value of each post or tweet and minimize consumer resentment.

Jumping on bandwagons

Casanova once said, "Be the flame, not the moth." Constant innovation in tech has created numerous sources of light -- and even more attracted insects. Ever chasing the buzz, brands want to reach early adopters. Smart brands capable of harnessing new technologies and engaging consumers with timely, relevant, and strategically aligned marketing messages -- in the new communication mediums of consumer choice -- lead the way for others to follow. Certainly, brands can benefit from quickly adopting the latest marketing tactics; however, they must do so with an overall strategic goal in mind or risk resembling a pest loitering around with no apparent purpose. In other words, adopting new marketing tactics solely for the sake of adoption leads to nowhere. Unfortunately, this is a habit that's tough to break.

Although real-time marketing has been around for years, the phrase has exploded within the past year -- and the practice will continue its growth. According to MediaPost, "76 percent of marketers are using real-time marketing, and 88 percent consider it important to their 2014 plans." Consequently, brand marketers are waiting with bated breath for that perfect opportunity to reach audiences with contextually relevant content in the moment. And many brands have seen success -- from Oreo's oft-mentioned "Dunk in the Dark" to NASA's "Gravity" tweet during the Oscars to my personal favorite from Citi Bike and J.Crew. Trying to duplicate these real-time victories, other brands have hopped on board with dissimilar results.

Take, for instance, Dockers' attempt during the 2014 Oscars. We all remember Arby's Twitter conversation with Pharrell Williams during the Grammys, in which the sandwich chain commented on Pharrell's hat for its resemblance to the company's logo. Proceeding the Grammys, Pharrell put his hat up for auction on eBay. Just before the Oscars, Arby's purchased the hat for $44,100, receiving a shout out from Pharrell.

Dockers, who had been encouraging Arby's to purchase the hat prior to the event, chimed in on the conversation.

Although it's hard to fault Dockers' endeavor, the company's tweet pales in comparison with the more substantial, wider-reaching conversation between Pharrell and Arby's, which, needless to say, involved thousands of retweets and dollars. The unfortunate result for Dockers, despite its best intentions, is an appearance of desperation, attempting to ride the coattails of Arby's real-time success. As previously mentioned, quickly adopting something new can prove beneficial. However, if you chose to catch a ride on a bandwagon, be sure to know where it's going.

Relying too much on automation

An invaluable tool, automation is an extremely hot topic. Aptly stated on Econsultancy's blog, automation is "an important tool for bringing order to the warring worlds of marketing and sales by improving lead scoring and nurturing." When correctly applied, it effectively manages the targeting and timing of marketing content in response to consumer behavior. In other words, automation can lead to personalized interactions and increased engagement rates. When used incorrectly, marketing automation undercuts the human-to-human connection ingrained in the most innovative and exciting advertising efforts today.

There are a number of ways to fail with automation. Although it leads to consumer insights in real time, brands may neglect to create new content to match the buyer's entire life cycle, relying on hackneyed messaging from the past. Furthermore, even if new content is created based on holistic knowledge about consumers, it should reach them via the right channels, not exclusively email. In addition, brands that merely talk at consumers with automation tools rather than using the technology to sharpen their listening skills undermine the person-focused approach behind automation. One area in particular where brands seemingly can't help but screw up is social media automation.

We all remember the slogan from the Ronco rotisserie oven infomercials, "Set it and forget it!" Unfortunately, marketers are applying this motto to their social messaging strategy, scheduling updates to increase efficiency but neglecting their accounts entirely. Consequently, brands miss entire conversations with consumers, which is the point of social media marketing -- reciprocal conversation. As a result, many have turned to auto-replies to ensure consumers aren't ignored. This obviously increases response rates, but when the replies are generic, irrelevant, or inappropriate, high response rates mean nothing.

Although Domino's Pizza managed to turn its business around with a complete product makeover and extremely innovative marketing, the company isn't immune to automation fails. As reported by Digiday, when a happy fan posted a compliment on Domino's Facebook page, the company responded with an apology.

Even if this mistake can be accredited to a human, as Domino's suggests, it is likely the result of an individual uploading a predetermined response -- failing to actually listen to the fan -- which is robotic behavior nonetheless.

Furthermore, Twitter is a treasure trove of auto-reply failures. Oreo, a company that typically dominates social media, recently found itself in hot water. The brand replied to a user with a chance to receive a free pack of cookies. Sounds harmless right? Not when the reply is (likely) automated and the user's handle contains extremely offensive and racist words.

Social media automation is only a small piece of the entire automation pie, but mistakes within this segment reach a vast number of people, especially for brands as pervasive as those detailed above. If you're able to create highly personalized relationships with consumers by engaging them with relevant content and monitoring the conversation, automation is the tool for you. On the other hand, if you're lazy with automation and allow it to overpower the human voice and human judgment of your brand, consumers will move on to other, less robotic options.

Creating content for the brand -- not the consumer

As iMedia has noted, content marketing is nothing new. In fact, John Deere began publishing its magazine for farmers, The Furrow, in 1895 (and it's still produced today). However, 2013 was arguably the year of "content marketing," so companies scrambled to produce content internally or outsourced their efforts to those claiming expertise. Although savvy brands established clear marketing goals and understood the fundamental characteristics of successful content, many recklessly circulated haphazard content to the world. Consequently, a glut of shoddy content flooded the internet.

Let's not forget the purpose of content marketing. According to the Content Marketing Institute, its function is to "attract and retain customers by consistently creating and curating relevant and valuable content with the intention of changing or enhancing consumer behavior." If your content isn't relevant and valuable from the consumer's perspective, it's pointless. Consequently, for a brand to truly capitalize on content marketing's potential, it should not approach content creation from a sales perspective but should assess the value of content in relation to practicality and genuine allure. Content marketing should be messaging individuals want to consume, not forced-fed junk food. With this in mind, let's take a look at how an innovative company failed to maintain a consumer-centered approach with their content marketing.

GE's visually appealing Ecomagination site is home to articles, videos, and images focused on green innovation and clean technology. Unfortunately, upon further investigation, the majority of content on the website is self-promotional, focused primarily on highlighting GE's accomplishments rather than painting a comprehensive portrait of the topics covered. Sure, the content is important to GE, but do clients and customers care?

At the same time, GE's online destination Txchnologist certainly upholds its focus on customers, serving as a genuine platform for conversations about science and technology.

Whether you love it or hate it (love the term or hate the term), content marketing is an essential part of many brands marketing mix. For it to be effective, however, brands must continue to create content from the consumer's perspective and always remember to provide value, not volume.

Kyle Montero is contributing editor of iMedia Connection.

On Twitter? Follow iMedia Connection at @iMediaTweet.

"Concept of stress and frustration" image via Shutterstock.

Kyle Montero


to leave comments.