Those of us who rely on free listings on search portals like Google, Yahoo! or MSN have a problem. We want to create great, relevant and compelling pages for our prospects and our customers, and we want those pages to be listed by the search engines in order to get the content into the right people's hands. Unfortunately, we have limited and often contradictory information about what helps move us up the list, and about what might get us removed altogether, so the process of changing content in order to make it better is a risky proposition.
What the search engines tell usDespite their best efforts, the portals regularly send our natural traffic to pages that are not the ones that we would choose. While we may like to change these natural search landing pages to improve the prospect experience, we are rightly fearful: If we change the page, will we lose our ranking? If we optimize the page for natural search traffic, will we get de-listed?
It's difficult to know, because although the search portals share information about how to rank well in natural search results, the information is scarce (here is Google's information) and some of the recommendations are contradictory.
At Search Engine Strategies in London a few weeks ago, a couple of Google folks reinforced this message when they suggested we build the site for our users. "Create the best experience for them that you can. The most important thing is that the landing page and the site are relevant and useful," they said. "Treat the spiders the same as any first time visitor. Do not show one page to spiders and another to 'real' visitors or you may get in trouble."
And finally, "If your page has problems, we notify you and there are ways to get the issue ironed out." However, it was not clear if they would notify you before delisting you or after, and if your page would be returned immediately or after a formal appeal and review process. The conversation ended before I could gather this information.
What the experts tell us, and what we believeAn endless number of third parties fill in the blanks with their interpretations about how the search results are determined. A quick search on Google for "landing page optimization tips" re-turns 339 results, for example.
Then there is the "common knowledge." Most people believe the following:
Despite our best efforts, we may lose rank anywayUnfortunately, even if you don't mess with your page, your rank could change. That's because the rules that the search engines use to rank sites change as they discover newer, and presumably better, ways to rank results. A page that ranked well one day might drop to the third or fourth page the next, or get removed altogether.
The result is that we live in a state of fear about changing well-ranked pages, while knowing that even if we don't change them we could lose rank anyway.
So when we realize that we want to change our natural search landing pages because they don't provide the best user experience, we wonder whether it might make sense to experiment with changes despite our fears.
Although Google suggests that we don't present different content to search engines than you display to users (commonly referred to as "cloaking"), some of us consider showing content on the page that reinforces the word or term that the prospect searched for on Google by using an automated "keyword repeater" functionality. Others of us wonder whether we can make the page better in general simply by using a little "fancy stuff" that will provide an improved experience for our visitors.
Next: Three tactics to take
Not a People Connection member?
Full Summit Calendar | Request Invite
1 5 ad technologies that will be dead in 5 years
2 The best social media campaigns of 2013
3 6 signs your agency is dying
4 The most meaningless (and hilarious) job titles on LinkedIn
5 8 types of problem clients (and how to handle them)