Where You Should Stick Your Ad and Why

Return to What's important to someone depends on what's happening in their life

One of the first things NextStage discovered in this research was just how little people creating ads and placing ads knew about where their ads were going to end up. This is aptly demonstrated in this figure:

(click to enlarge)

Remember my writing that knowing where to place an ad to maximize ROI means knowing things like age, gender, education, training, lifestyle, et cetera, of the target audience? The first figure has an OnStar banner and a series of sponsored links as a right hand wide skyscraper.

These are both good ads in and of themselves. However, placing them on a page announcing the passing of a specific demographic's cultural icon is not so good.

People outside of the demographic who knew Don Herbert as Mr. Wizard will receive a very different emotional and psychological impact than people familiar with Don Herbert's work.

The question becomes, who is this page intended for and who are the ads intended for? The ideal is to have the ads' audience and the page's audience synchronized. I'm particularly amused by the top ad in the wide skyscraper, "How to Sleep More."

I don't think that's going to be Don's problem, nor do I think people who were familiar with Don Herbert are going to read about his passing and think "Yeah, that's what I need, a sleep aid!" Similarly, "Get the OnStar Treatment". Umm...you mean death? In both cases, I think I'll pass.

Strangely enough, the OnStar ad would have worked on this page as a wide skyscraper. A simple skyscraper metaphorically going from earth to heaven, richer blue on top than on the bottom to give the sense of ascension, would have done the trick of passing to the non-conscious mind "Don's okay, hence I can also be okay with OnStar". This treatment would have been very successful with the audience who'd come to the page to read about Don Herbert's passing.

Next: Ads that work well within pages

Joseph Carrabis is CRO and founder of NextStage Evolution and NextStage Global and founder of KnowledgeNH and NH Business Development Network. Read full bio. He was recently selected as a senior research fellow and board advisor for the Society for New Communications Research.

 

Comments

Joseph Carrabis
Joseph Carrabis August 28, 2008 at 8:30 AM

Rob, Sorry I didn't see this until now. "Many actionable solutions"? Well, we do have that tool that determines where ads should be placed based on user responses to some questions.
Are there some general rules? How general would you like them? "For boomer males do x except when marketing high end cars or when there's a slightly younger female in the creative or the product is an OTC or ..."
I know the goal is to make things as simple as possible and sometimes the simplest solution results in the 30 or so questions we currently ask (and I'm happy to learn there's a simpler solution with as high an accuracy). This isn't a defense (as I hope you'll agree I'm always working to improve things and enjoy discovering alternate methods that simplify things and freely recommend them).
Developing the tool and this article was quite an experience for me. I was shocked to learn about the disconnects that exist(ed) in the system -- who didn't talk to whom, who didn't know what and couldn't find out. Something as simple as not knowing where (on what sites) the creative would show up, hence essentially shooting in the dark and hoping you were at least shooting in the direction of the target. You reference this in your "hysterical/horrifying ad/story combinations".
"...there are still a number of moving parts that need to be addressed..." Agreed. And quite willing to discuss.
And thanks for reading my column. - Joseph

Rob Graham
Rob Graham June 22, 2007 at 1:39 PM

I enjoyed the article and found is very interesting. I'm a bit biased perhaps as Joseph is a friend of mine. However, from a practicality standpoint I'm not sure he was able to offer many actionable solutions. Joseph has accurately pointed out that there are a number of shortcomings regarding ad placement that few of us would dispute. However, I don't think he is able to, not would I expect it, to offer up some sort of unifying solution here. I think the real challenge is to get advertisers to think about the benefits of really planning ad buys and ad placement and not just defaulting to choosing a group of silos to push content into. Also keep in mind that most of the logic engines behind contextual advertising still haven't been tweaked enough to avoid the sometime hysterical/horrifying ad/story combinations that result. The article wasn't too long and it brought up some excellent points for media planning. However, there are still a number of moving parts that need to be addressed further before the industry can really act upon a lot of these insights.