In Focus

Is the Homepage Dead?

Garrick Schmitt, Avenue A | Razorfish

Today’s digital consumer opts for an array of niche and broad web offerings, using emerging technologies such as AJAX, RSS and widgets to create their own personalized online experiences. Our largest and most well-known media clients now see more than 50 percent of their traffic originating from outside their domain (i.e., the content that is contained in search engines, blogs, et cetera). This is a far cry from a few years ago, when 75 to 80 percent of traffic originated at their homepage. In response, we’ve helped our clients gear their site designs to welcome consumers at a specific video page or at a specific article page rather than relying on the homepage, which helps drive traffic deeper into their site.


Garrick Schmitt is vice president of user experience at Avenue A | Razorfish. Read full bio.

Simplifying homepages down to the core elements and providing intuitive, visually appealing paths to additional information contained within the site helps reduce confusion and increases consumer engagement.

In conjunction with this transformation, the page view is also dying off. This has led many of us, including Nielsen//NetRatings -- just this month -- to look for a new mix of more meaningful metrics. Savvy marketers have begun to eschew the page view in favor of much more telling statistics like reach, frequency and time spent on site. Also, there is a greater emphasis on user-initiated metrics, such as subscriptions to RSS feeds and widgets, which now play bigger roles in media consumption.

Let me explain how these technologies are contributing:

  • AJAX is reason No. 1 for the death of the page view. AJAX, which stands for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML, enables us to design and build the next generation of websites and applications, where all user activity happens in one single page. Suddenly consumers can now check email, get directions, pay bills and watch as many videos as they would like without ever refreshing the page. One page = no more page views.
  • RSS, which stands for Really Simple Syndication, is another major factor. Until recently, RSS was planted firmly in the domain of early adopters (e.g., geeks) who preferred to receive content from publishers like The New York Times or blogs and read the content in special RSS readers, all without ever actually having to visit those websites. In the near future, the notion of actually having to visit a website, let alone a page, will become antiquated.
  • Widgets. Newsweek has declared ‘07 as the year of the widget, and with good reason. Widgets, which are primarily JavaScript or Flash file interface elements (like text boxes or windows) that a computer interacts with, are going mainstream. The biggest growth will be in widgets that are incorporated into web pages. YouTube, with its video streams plastered across the web, is the most prominent example. Advertisers like Volkswagen are jumping into the fray by sponsoring downloadable desktop applications (e.g., VW’s desktop calendar). We’ll no longer be constrained to “pages” but can experience any type of application in any environment at any time.

Further outlook for more big shifts
Look for ‘08 to bring a host of new ways to actually measure how users are actively engaging with a digital property. From counting “posts” (commenting on a page) to quantifying submissions of content/media (such as audio or video) to a given site, we will see a number of new metrics associated with the social web.

After all, isn’t the property that causes the most conversation (or interaction) truly the most popular?

 

Comments

Mario Sgambelluri
Mario Sgambelluri July 24, 2007 at 12:31 PM

The homepage isn’t dead, and it’s not dying anytime soon. How healthy the homepage is, of course, depends on what you do. As [x+1]’s Shergalis points out, for DR purposes, the homepage is certainly less relevant these days. However, for branding purposes, as Wooster of T3 explains, the homepage remains vital. Now, if you’re a content provider, Carrabis nailed it: “How we define homepages needs to change.” (Almost) every page online can be the first entry point for a user, so naturally, “every page is a homepage.” This means every page you publish needs to work towards driving deeper engagement with a reader (think contextually relevant x-promotion). But what about the classic homepage? I like Thorp’s advice: “ask yourself what your homepage should say to the world.” Also, ask where the homepage fits into your business. The reasoning might go: What’s your company’s mission, what strategic goal does the homepage serve in that mission, and (given today’s internet surfing behavior) how can you redesign it (or promote it) to make that happen?

grattan mccoach
grattan mccoach July 24, 2007 at 9:52 AM

Have a look at the new guardian.co.uk. Look at the homepage. Is there any advertising on it? No, you won't find any. They've effectively stopped all the grubby little efforts of marketers to monetise it. The advertising doesn't appear until you click through to a news page or sector/section page. This is effective in two ways: First, it doesn't interfere with the 'business' end of the site - the homepage - which often distracts viewers from the true essence of what the site is actually about; second, it is refreshing. So, in the case of online newspapers, the homepage is very much alive.

grattan mccoach
grattan mccoach July 24, 2007 at 9:30 AM

Is the homepage dead? I think that depends on the nature of the business that each particular website is designed to address. But certainly, I think the each page should provide the viewer with every piece of information, or access to every piece of information, that a particular website has to offer and each subsequent page or "street" should also contain somewhere, somehow the same information as each other and a link to every other page so that every single page within a particular site is linked to each other in one way or another. This results in effectively treating every page like a homepage in that no matter where people land within your site, they have access to everything the site has to offer. And yes, the less pages you have, the better.

Robert Kadar
Robert Kadar July 23, 2007 at 11:19 AM

Interesting article. However, how did I find it? I went to the Home Page of iMedia Connection. How about you? Robert Kadar Good Health Advertising Rob at Good Health Advertising.com

Dawn Boshcoff
Dawn Boshcoff July 23, 2007 at 9:35 AM

Many useful considerations for site developers and clients to iron out in the process of building an effective site that targets traffic. One of the key messages here is to build from the outside in,, developing content and easy access to information based on the user's needs, This is lterally thinking 'out of the box'..

Dean Donaldson
Dean Donaldson July 23, 2007 at 9:34 AM

When was the last time you visited Amazon homepage? They stumbled across this phenomenon years ago and made money proving this principle – up selling and cross selling depending upon my requirements and not expecting me to go on a linear journey. the fact is search engines killed them off before most people realised what a website is. Content is king – the online world is not a photocopy of a brochure online with a nice cover and content – it is a dynamic organism that should be developed around “me - the user”. Personalisation of homepages or jump points are now on the desktop – whether using “Today” in MSN Messenger to get a quick overview of stories and my mail, or whether it is desktop widgets and gadgets as proven by Vista, the question is not so much is the homepage dead, but are websites dead? Best not tell any clients this – after all they are still justifying online by ‘click thru’…

Shrikant Menon
Shrikant Menon July 23, 2007 at 9:27 AM

I agree with the article to a large extent. Today the homepage has become seemingly less anchor like. Entry points are being defined by value each word of content generates for the viewer. With sections and subsctions gaining access across the website it has made the website into a collection of homepage like pages.

Michael Andich
Michael Andich July 23, 2007 at 9:08 AM

It's a great question, given that the web world has shifted and there is such a focus on search and video and other entry points. My sense is that web professionals and design folks get it, but the decision makers in corporate America still have a traditional view of how the web works, or should work in their typically 'ordered way'. However, Web 2.0 is proving how dynamic and regularly chaotic the web can be.