Is Facebook traffic in the toilet?

Facebook has taken a beating lately, and its traffic is down 27 percent for the week ending Feb. 23 from a high during the holidays, according to Hitwise. But it's not clear whether that really means bad news for the social network, which has seen an increase in the amount of time users spend on the site.

While Hitwise wasn't sure why Facebook had seen a traffic decline -- the deluge of friend requests and sizeable base of students returning to their studies are viewed as possible culprits -- it did have some good news for the social network. According to Hitwise, the average time spent online has increased 73 percent in the last year. On average, users now spend 21 minutes and 22 seconds on Facebook. 

But Hitwise isn't the only firm giving Facebook a hard time about its numbers. Last week, TechCrunch reported that comScore had seen a leveling out of Facebook's total traffic over the past few months. The site attracted 33.9 million unique U.S. visitors in January, down from 34.7 million in December. But worldwide Facebook grew by 3 percent.

While many have taken to calling the sluggish numbers "Facebook fatigue," the site has always maintained that traffic isn't the measure of its strength, and the fact that time spent online is up for the site seems to bode well for its future. However, CNET columnist Caroline McCarthy chalked Facebook's woes up to a fading cool factor.

"Facebook's traffic may indeed be leveling off, something that should naturally happen after any site's phase of frenetic growth, McCarthy wrote. "Now it's up to the site to prove that it can stay relevant and useful to the base that it's already built up."

Steve Hall at AdRants took a similar view.

"When a shiny new object shows up, everyone at least has to check it out," Hall wrote.  "It's unclear if there's actually a new shiny object out there at this point aside from an expansive plethora of widgetized Web 2.0 goodies, but Facebook's shine won't last forever."

 

Comments

John SChulte
John SChulte February 27, 2008 at 9:52 AM

Of the many social networks, I really do like the Facebook site, and I was working very hard on the direct marketing groups I started creating for our members around the world.

However, Facebook has some unusual rules that made me think twice about investing more time in this so I stopped.

Case in point. The National Mail Order Association (NMOA) has thousands of members all over the world, mostly in the USA. So I was working to create a special group for each state so I could tell all our members to join their state group and network...locally.

But this effort was ground to a halt, and I was threatened with expulsion because I was making too many groups too fast. But when I asked what is too many and what is too fast? I was told that they are not allowed to tell me that.

So...I stop. Maybe many others have found other unusual policies that make them say...why bother. Eventually there will be an accumulative effect, maybe it's now. I could be driving thousands there myself.

John Kaduwanema
John Kaduwanema February 27, 2008 at 8:01 AM

I am for one are glad to see the autumn of this blatant gimmick. Like wikipedia, it was a brilliant idea to bring people together on the internet. Unfortunately profits got in the way of this rather noble aspiration.

Eva Cartmel
Eva Cartmel February 27, 2008 at 4:05 AM

More and more on Facebook we are seeing groups petitioning for a ban on forced invites. It seems to me that Facebook users have had enough of ridiculous applications that won't work and/or force you to basically spam your friends before you can see your results. This general dissatisfaction and weariness with pointless invitations could be a factor in its declining popularity. Personally I am grateful to Facebook for putting me back in touch with old friends.