The X Factor: Why online pre-roll is dead

Ad content plasticity: Huh? Did I make that up? Uhhhโ€ฆ. yup. But it sounds important, doesn't it? The reason why television commercials work is because content is standardized from ad-to-show length. Online? You actively choose a piece of content you want to get and blam! Commercial. That 15-second pre-roll had three delays in it. Fetching it, inserting it and the gap before content. Result? You first waited 40 seconds before your one minute piece of content. The technology just, well, sucks. What do we need? A way to dynamically adjust your spot to varying lengths. That is what I mean by ad content plasticity. We need to be able to create a 30-second spot that can end at any point, still communicate what we need and then have the serving systems dynamically adjust. It's just that the "creatives" in offline don't think that way.

Consumer tolerance: Look, there's someone in this equation who is not the agency, or the client, or the vendor. Remember them? The person that actually uses your product? We create standards, but it's all a bunch of ego stroking. Those standards are created by people in our industry, for our own benefit. They try to act in the best interest of the consumer but are fearful of the power of those it affects. The 15-second pre-roll? Oh, come on! For pre-roll, I say five seconds. That's about all someone will tolerate, and you better give it to them in five seconds. Then figure out a way to do mid-roll so the consumer is getting the content they want first. Oh yeah, I forgot, our wonderful MPEG-4 standard would have to be re-encoded if we split it. Yup, again, technology preventing us from doing what is in the best interest of the consumer.

So what do you do?

If you are client-side running these programs, and you do measure correctly, and it's working, don't stop. But if you want to spend money in online video, just use your commercials and have the best impact -- try NBC Rewind. Immersive, long-form content wrapped with your brand, with the dual effect of commercials, banner exposure and persistence of ad exposure throughout. Now, that you can measure.

If you're on the agency side, figure out a way to get your creatives to think about it differently, and find a solution to ad content creation to make it more efficient. Don't present ideas that are going to have us shell out fees in perpetuity to some union.

If you're on the publisher side, ScanScout has a very promising technology that solves many of the issues I mentioned above. Check it out. And no, I don't own stock, and I don't work for them. As with NBC Rewind, I call it like I see it. Let's hope they -- or some other similar technology -- gets adopted as a standard, because pre-roll both sucks and blows.

In the end, until we solve the content creation bottleneck, figure out how to measure it and get the cost down to something that compares to large-format banners, or it just loses out on every metric.

Pre-roll is dead, long live something else but pre-roll, please.

Ranty rant signing offโ€ฆ

<< Previous page

Sean X Cummings is director of marketing for Ask.com. Read full bio.

 

Comments

David Sidman
David Sidman March 23, 2008 at 3:25 PM

I couldn't agree more, and I hear this echoed in every conference I attend: users hate pre-roll ads so much they even abandon the video roll itself; and nobody hangs around afterwards to watch a post-roll ad.

I believe the answer is to use video ad formats that put more control into the CUSTOMER'S hands for whether and how they respond to the advertising. If they are alerted to an ad message with proper respect, AND they are then interested enough to affirmatively explore the ad on their own initiative, you get a format that is user-friendly yet still performs better for the advertiser.

There could be many possible ways to implement such a format, but I think it helps to be able to talk about a specific example - so if I could ask forgiveness in advance for shamelessly pitching an alternative - again recognizing that this is just one possible approach - Linkstorm offers a format whereby the video can launch immediately and continue to run, but with an indication near the edge of the player window that there's an ad offer available IF the customer is interested. IF AND WHEN the customer rolls their mouse over the ad's call-to-action, a cascading fly-out menu of links appears that shows the customer all the relevant destinations in advance that they might be interested in, and then takes them directly where they wants to go in a single click - right to the product they wanted, or the answer to their question, or the marketing info that would influence their purchase decision.

It's user-initiated, yet better-performing for the advertiser: when applied to regular banners, the CTR goes up by 3x-5x. In fact we're putting our money where our mouth is via a "March Madness" offer that guarantees to increase CTR by >50% or the campaign is free.

See two examples of how it would apply to video: http://www.linkstorms.com/demo/nbc/heroes_nissan_video/ (demo only) and http://www.linkstorms.com/clientresults/liveexamples/cisco_video/ (real campaign we did for Cisco where we overlaid our menu on top of a DoubleClick/Klipmart video ad).

Lawrence Johnson
Lawrence Johnson March 18, 2008 at 4:16 PM

This reminds me of what Marshall MacLuhan pointed out a generation ago when he suggested: that the message of any medium or technology is the change of scale or pace or pattern that it introduces into human affairs. The railway did not introduce movement or transportation or wheel or road into human society, but it accelerated and enlarged the scale of previous human functions, creating totally new kinds of cities and new kinds of work and leisure. (Understanding Media., 1964,). What McLuhan writes about the railroad applies with equal validity to online media.
Misalignment of messaging with the target channels and audiences is misguided and inefficacious. And this is quite independent of the content being disseminated. So let's refrain from the simple reflex of repurposing content through the wrong channel without a thorough understanding of its underlying nature and our target audience's disposition when engaging such channel. Maybe one day we will get it. Thanks Sean for your insights..

Jeff Bach
Jeff Bach March 18, 2008 at 1:04 PM

Read a quote yesterday from Jakob Nielsen that asserted the web is not a selling-oriented platform - it is a buying platform. Nothing new here, his quote goes back to the old push vs. pull outlook on internet content. It reminded me that in a newspaper, magazine or on TV the ad is explicitly there and the viewer has little choice over the presence of that ad. This is essentially "sell-side", cram-it-down-their-throats-whether-they-want it or not kind of stuff.

We should all know by now that the web is different. In this space the viewer has all the power. They have a choice to click and view or NOT. This is "buy-side", where the user has a choice in what they CHOOSE to view. Pre-roll attempts to overcome this and maintain the old style business as usual. Pre-roll is not working for a variety of reason, as Sean points out.

I see something else, besides the traditional ad, having to emerge and am starting to fall on the webisode and product placement side of the fence. In any case, the large expense of video and the new production workflows that go along with it are HUGE obstacles to all but the largest clients. There has to be a better way than what is currently taking place.
my .02
Jeff Bach
Quietwater Films

Andrew Budkofsky
Andrew Budkofsky March 18, 2008 at 10:36 AM

Love the article today. But it's not the publishers fault (it never is!) Agencies and clients pushed for it, and still do by the way even though the entire planet knows it's not the most effective way. As soon as clients understand what the opportunities are in the video space, and the agencies stop being as lazy as a New Yorker who needs a pack of cigs delivered because the corner deli is too far away, the world will be a better place.

Giles Crouch
Giles Crouch March 18, 2008 at 10:15 AM

This is the 90-Second Economy, this means how people allocate their most precious resource; time. TV is a passive activity, we watch. Done. The Web is an "active" place, when we're online we're "doing" something, and I think this is another reason you're right about pre-roll. It should be only 5 seconds, on the Web, you're lucky to get 90-Seconds of someones time. The concept of the "brand" on the Web needs to be about engagement, TV is a place to create awareness, and the formats are just so different. Broadcast TV should be supportive, Web active.
http://panopen.blogspot.com