The X Factor: How Google will kill ad networks

  • Previous
  • 1 of 3
  • Sign in for single page

OK, it's about time to think of something innovative for Google in SEM. Yes, Google now has universal search, but essentially the basic look of its results page hasn't fundamentally changed in 10 years.

Worse, the capabilities for advertisers to reach their consumers on that results page is about as dynamic and rich as, well, a rock. The only thing a rock is good for is throwing at someone. Maybe someone should throw a rock at those ads on the right side of Google’s search results page.

Outside of search Google does provide a variety of ever-expanding options to reach consumers through the company's various print, radio, even TV extensions. In many ways, Google is a media vulture circling every consumer advertising touchpoint it can. But on its main product an advertiser only gets limited characters to work with. Google may have the touchpoints, but what that message looks like is often very important, and what search ads look like make my eyes bleed. Google may get your message in front of consumers, but do we really want to exist in a world where it dictates the creative lens to our consumers?

Never before in history has an ad medium so limiting in communication been so effective, so powerful and so pervasive. It's all about simplicity, and because of that simplicity, Google succeeded. It was the utilitarian nature of paid search listings that provided a somewhat level playing field for all advertisers. If you bid enough, your small company can outsmart and outsell companies 10 times your size.

So, are the rumors true about Google considering display advertising on results pages? They would be idiots not to. Think of it like an advertiser. You can buy keywords the same way but also have a display ad show up targeted to those keywords. It's the Holy Grail for click-based display advertisers who rely on ad networks due to their vast reach and low cost. And that represents a significant chunk of the ad space.

So, does Google Display on search results pages kill ad networks? Well, not in the way that a roach motel "kills bugs dead." But a lot of them will go the way of the dinosaur.

You have to understand the ad dynamic "need state" of consumers and the relationship they have with your product.

Next page >>

 

Comments

Taylor Trask
Taylor Trask June 19, 2008 at 11:53 AM

Ahhh, thanks for the response and clarification!

Sean X
Sean X June 17, 2008 at 2:49 PM

I completely agree with you. I was not commenting that it was good for the end user at all. Only advertisers. In fact I would love it if more companies would seek to run revenue neutral operations.

The end-user is not at Google for Ads, they are there to find what they are looking for. The difference in what search engines do however is profound when it comes to advertising. If you are on a normal site the ad is usually a distraction; often having nothing to do at ll with the content of the site, or the relevancy of the ad.

With ad networks it is even more of a disconnect. By definition the text ads on search engines are relevant to the search. Often you will find that the paid listings are as relevant as the organic ones. Wouldn't it be great if display advertising had the same type of relevancy to the end user?

As to most display ads sucking ass. Yup. That was my statement that if they do do display that some of the democratization of their advertising would be lost as display ads require a higher level of work and are byond most smaller advertisers without the budgets for such endeavors.

Taylor Trask
Taylor Trask June 17, 2008 at 10:37 AM

Do you REALLY want anyone deciding how their ads should look and feel on Google searches!?! I've seen most internet ads...........they suck ass. Google had it right by mandating text-based ads on their site........I would do the same for my site.

Also, people aren't at google to be sold something, they're there to get search results. The answer to your original question is "no."