In Focus

8 secrets for viral gold

Strategy

Let's take a look at the three most common methods for obtaining a consumer-generated video.

  • The contest route: This is by far the easiest way to go. All a brand has to do is throw an assignment to the masses and wait for the return. To ensure some return, many brands spend on display or print ads to notify consumers about the contest. If successful, there will be thousands of submissions, so resources will be required to vet all of the entries. It will be a tedious task. A disproportionate number of entries will be of poor quality or otherwise unacceptable due to creators who didn't bother to read the rules or unknowingly violated copyright laws due to a lack of experience. And forget any idea that an important brand ad is going to come from YouTubers videotaping friends falling off skateboards or would-be creatives capturing a TV spot on their video cellphone. This approach is essentially about PR. If you are truly searching for great creative, this is an unlikely and time-consuming (and deceptively expensive) route for finding it.
  • The assignment route: Via the assignment route, you highlight your interest to a pre-screened talent pool. This pool will still number in the thousands, but it will be much more qualified in production. By taking this route you are working with semi-professionals and boutique shops, and they are going to pay closer attention to the creative brief and try hard to impress you. The average return may be just a couple hundred submissions, but they will be more usable. Typically, at least 10-20 percent of submissions will be broadcast-ready.
  • The single match route: This is a one-to-one approach. On the brand's end, there is a lot of research up front. You can review dozens or hundreds of portfolios before finding and selecting a videographer. While this method does provide the brand with more control, a major downfall is that you only get one person's idea, and there is no guarantee that you will like what you get. It's the CGA version of hiring a single ad agency. Considering that consumer-generated video is a great way to gain insight into consumer opinion of your brand and new ideas to incorporate into your ad mix, you will be losing those benefits with the single match route.
 

Comments

Michael Brown
Michael Brown August 4, 2008 at 3:26 PM

What is of grave concern for me, and eventually this will have to be addressed.

Case in point:
I entered a $100,000 video ad contest along with 1,000 others. I didn't win. Nevertheless, they could use my entry anywhere they want, as long as they want without ANY compensation.

In fact, my ad could do a millions times better than the $100,000 winner, yet I would not see a dime.

For me to devote any serious attention and time to the viral online video market, if they end up liking my work enough to use it, they should pay for it.

These contests will not go on for long before many serious creators band together and say enough is enough.

If they use our work, they pay for our work.

Jonathan Lynch
Jonathan Lynch August 4, 2008 at 2:24 PM

I won a video contest from Xlant Ads and it defiantly took longer then 30 days to get paid. I think it's pretty to have a net 30 policy when it comes to payment. The reality of web video is that it's still so new that no one know what will work best when it comes to web marketing using viral video. Also, what will work best tends to change from day to day, week to week and year to year. Being able to stay ahead of changes in the market means being innovative and taking risks.