In Focus

4 websites that failed

Entertainment: Alan Schulman, imc2

When it comes to entertainment sites, one that might want to delve into some stronger branding and better usability is Spike.com, the little bro' to Viacom's Spike TV network.

OK, so just because this is a network for guys doesn't mean it has to assault you from a user experience perspective. Honestly, it's great to have video on your homepage. But to make sure its value justifies the kind of homepage CPMs that video pre-rolls and spots are getting these days, please don't assault me with multiple pieces of video auto playing simultaneously. Some are ads and others are content, but who can distinguish?

Oh yeah....there's that "advertisement" copy burned in over the fat guy who is next to the clips of the bikini-clad chick who is right on top of the feature story. Lots of content categories to choose from here for your average brain-dead male misogynist -- like girls, games, viral and wheels.

But if you're looking for what's on the network that's hot or action-packed tonight, you'll need to do some digging down below the fold a bit. What I'd rather see is a network prouder of its logo and ethic (girls just don't get it) plastered right up front on the homepage with tonight's hottest content highlights rather than another story about the Sexy Pole Vaulter who took Gold. Those stories abound on every trashy guy's site. 

C'mon Spike, be proud, be loud, and stop looking like a syndicated site for guys with your logo tacked on it. You're the guy's guy network!

Alan Schulman is executive creative director of imc2.

 

Comments

Barbara Postell
Barbara Postell March 4, 2010 at 9:11 AM

Your website advertised "Refinance Rates at 4.25% Fixed!" and it also stated, "No Hidden Fees, Points, or Closing Costs!"
I completed a mortgage request for a refinance. When I contacted one of the four "trusted" lenders that you recommended, I was informed that my "Closing Costs" would amount to $4,500.00. This is in stark contrast to your website advertisement. Please explain this discrepancy, and if you can, please refer me to one of your "trusted lenders" who will comply with what your website advertises, IF you can!
Thank you.
Barbara

Nanette Marcus
Nanette Marcus August 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM

Thanks for your comments, everyone!

Andrew - we do have an upcoming piece featuring great work in the space, so be on the lookout for that! And also be sure to check out our Creative Showcase section, where we regularly highlight great creative and websites.

Andrew Siegel
Andrew Siegel August 21, 2008 at 4:26 PM

Great article, but why not take it to the next level and show off an example of GREAT work in the space. Regarding Spike, if they want to be Maxim online, then they've got it just right, but that wastes their greatest asset: their content. This site completely ignores 90% of their viewers, people going to the site after having seen a show, looking for additional info. Use the site to extend the brand, - storyline extensions, games, contests, related products, etc.

Kim Stearns
Kim Stearns August 20, 2008 at 12:08 PM

GREAT GREAT ARTICLE! I love the breakdown of these homepages with the inclusion of suggestions...well done!

Neil Squillante
Neil Squillante August 20, 2008 at 10:06 AM

Great article! It reminds me of the way B-to-B Magazine used to compare print ads. Well, maybe it still does, but I don't read print publications anymore. Please consider making this a weekly feature.

Dave Morse
Dave Morse August 20, 2008 at 9:29 AM

It reminds me of when ad agencies are given responsibility to build a website!

David Meerman Scott wrote an excellent (must-read) article entitled, "Don't Trust an Advertising Agency to Build Your Web Site".

Read it here: http://www.davidmeermanscott.com/resources.htm