In Focus

4 websites that failed

Finance: Hillel Cooperman, Jackson Fish Market

The mortgage crisis has affected people in many negative ways. But it's not like we didn't know it was happening. Even if you didn't know what percentage of online display ad inventory was being bought by mortgage lenders, you knew it wasn't small. For years, their ads plastered every spare inch of real estate in many of the sites we all use. The ads also had a certain quality about them -- sort of a local radio meets what fonts come with Windows aesthetic. Miss them?

Have no fear... just head over to LendGo and bask in the goodness.

I can't tell whether it's the influence of the grassy knoll in Windows XP or there was actually a study advocating on behalf of the soothing effects of endless fields of grass and blue sky, but there it is front and center. Luckily, you won't get too lost in the swaying fields because every square inch is covered with super subtle call-outs like "No Obligations," "No Credit Checks," "Bad Credit OK!"

Personally, I think the exclamation loses some of its impact when it's at the end of every single sentence! Even more egregious, however, is the misspelling of the word "completely." If typos aren't enough to instill you with confidence about your lender recommendation site, I don't know what will.

Up in the upper left hand corner is the ubiquitous LendGo logo -- a registered trademark, by the way. I'm not even sure why they bothered to trademark their logo because I can't imagine anyone actually wanting to use it. It's tiny, but it's clearly the ever-classic poorly drawn cartoon man running as he throws dollar bills (twenties?) from his hands into the air. Obviously, thanks to the folks at LendGo he's got so much money that throwing it -- literally -- is no big deal.

The folks at LendGo have made their site using what I like to call "the aesthetic of distrust." Basically, it's a site that is so unattractive, put together in such a slap-dash fashion, trying to get your money, hiding who they really are, that it's ultimately a rat's nest of links leading you to various pages of questionable reputation all in the hopes that you'll keep clicking until you've mortgaged your house, or done some other scary thing.

I'm not saying that the folks at LendGo are anything other than a reputable source of "Qualified Lenders and Low Rates," like its tagline says. I am saying that the way its site looks makes me wonder if I could ever trust the company.

Frankly, I'm glad all these sites look the same because, at least for me, I can identify and navigate away from them very quickly. I keep worrying that these sites will get smart and start to look professional, and then it will take more work to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Interestingly, I don't think that will happen. The sad truth is that sites use this aesthetic to get people to click because... it works.

Hillel Cooperman is a founder of Jackson Fish Market, a small company focused on making beautiful, branded, web experiences.

Nanette Marcus is cover stories editor for iMedia Connection.

 

Comments

Barbara Postell
Barbara Postell March 4, 2010 at 9:11 AM

Your website advertised "Refinance Rates at 4.25% Fixed!" and it also stated, "No Hidden Fees, Points, or Closing Costs!"
I completed a mortgage request for a refinance. When I contacted one of the four "trusted" lenders that you recommended, I was informed that my "Closing Costs" would amount to $4,500.00. This is in stark contrast to your website advertisement. Please explain this discrepancy, and if you can, please refer me to one of your "trusted lenders" who will comply with what your website advertises, IF you can!
Thank you.
Barbara

Nanette Marcus
Nanette Marcus August 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM

Thanks for your comments, everyone!

Andrew - we do have an upcoming piece featuring great work in the space, so be on the lookout for that! And also be sure to check out our Creative Showcase section, where we regularly highlight great creative and websites.

Andrew Siegel
Andrew Siegel August 21, 2008 at 4:26 PM

Great article, but why not take it to the next level and show off an example of GREAT work in the space. Regarding Spike, if they want to be Maxim online, then they've got it just right, but that wastes their greatest asset: their content. This site completely ignores 90% of their viewers, people going to the site after having seen a show, looking for additional info. Use the site to extend the brand, - storyline extensions, games, contests, related products, etc.

Kim Stearns
Kim Stearns August 20, 2008 at 12:08 PM

GREAT GREAT ARTICLE! I love the breakdown of these homepages with the inclusion of suggestions...well done!

Neil Squillante
Neil Squillante August 20, 2008 at 10:06 AM

Great article! It reminds me of the way B-to-B Magazine used to compare print ads. Well, maybe it still does, but I don't read print publications anymore. Please consider making this a weekly feature.

Dave Morse
Dave Morse August 20, 2008 at 9:29 AM

It reminds me of when ad agencies are given responsibility to build a website!

David Meerman Scott wrote an excellent (must-read) article entitled, "Don't Trust an Advertising Agency to Build Your Web Site".

Read it here: http://www.davidmeermanscott.com/resources.htm