The X Factor: Banners and the death of advertising

  • Previous
  • 1 of 2
  • Sign in for single page

Ad networks are an insidious evil that have perpetrated our industry. They are a viral, exploding business model that fills our world with more annoying drivel fired at us one 30k banner at a time. It's the business equivalent of a massive outdoor flea market. It's eBay for display advertising. OK, OK... I'll calm down.

Ad networks are causing some profound changes to the advertising landscape. Is it their fault that we're stuck with the banner? No, of course not. It's our fault. We all stopped doing truly innovative advertising online. Publishers became locked in their designs, and sites became so expensive to modify with ever-expanding and more technical infrastructures, that we all got stuck in a system.

The agencies and the clients have produced so many ads at specific formats and requirements that any new format has a massive uphill battle. We've built a banner infrastructure. Getting out of it may be as difficult as reducing our dependence on oil. You could create the greatest human transportation device in the world, one that runs on electricity, that allows almost 30 percent of the entire U.S. population to commute back and forth to work, but if you couldn't use it when it was raining, and if cities banned their use on sidewalks or roads, it wouldn't work. We're mired in the same atrophied place online.

So what changed over the last three years in online advertising and why is it worse than ever? Why does it seem like the quality of advertising online is going down at an ever alarming rate? Ad networks.

Again, it is not their fault, it's what they've enabled that has created the current situation. The web grew too fast. Our consumption of online content grew too fast. And there is still not a model other than advertising that really pays for it all. More and more pages are viewed, and yet there just isn't enough advertising at premium prices to fill the space. Thirty percent of consumption and only 6 percent of advertising spending is done online. That's basic market economics. Too much supply, too little demand, prices plummet.

Enter the ad network to fill that void of billions and billions of ad impressions. The sales staffs at the larger sites could not possibly service all the potential clients, and the smaller sites with minimal traffic didn't have a sales staff. What we ended up with is blinky-blinky horrific eye-piercing creative to break through the clutter. Aesthetics went out the window. Our world became a direct response monster. The last time it happened was with Google AdWords. That revolution helped bring an effective advertising vehicle to the hundreds of thousands of small businesses across the country, and the world. The difference this time? Well, it's fairly difficult for any business to truly make something in AdWords look horrific. But banners? Oh, the horror!

It is, however, the ad networks that are going to save our industry, at least until we figure out how to really impact consumers online, and impact them in a way that is not custom ad creation, but a standardized format that is relatively easy to create, easy for clients to understand, and easy to measure.

Uh, yeah, we are so not there yet, are we? But when we do get there, ad networks will be the delivery mechanism for that creative. The ad servers will dish them out, but it's the ad networks that will be the nation's entry ramp. They are steadily becoming the backbone of our whole online ad delivery system. Until then, though, I'm stuck with the banner. We are all stuck with the banner -- the stupid moving pixel monstrosity.

The agencies and brands that do online advertising will someday have the budgets to create meaningful creative, with advertising agencies on retainer, internal staff to run marketing, and digital strategists who understand the medium. They will be able to attack social media, sponsorships and get away from the banner ad. But right now, they have AdWords, and they are hungry for more.

Banners? The consumer hates them, the creatives abhor them, but the clients love them, the agency makes a profit on them, and our entire industry benefits from them. Your view of ad networks and the banners they sling all depends on where you sit in the marketing landscape of the consumer, the agency, the client, the creative and, yes, even our industry.

Next page >>

 

Comments

Robert Kadar
Robert Kadar September 15, 2008 at 9:06 AM

I totally agree with Sean Cummings response to my post. I find the lack of creativity and the willingness to explore new online messaging tactics frustrating. In the health and pharma world in which we concentrate it's even tougher as the legal and "MedReg" departments of the pharma companies dictate techniques the marketing departments can utilize. Much of online advertising has become transactional in nature with little in the way of truly creative or breakthrough thinking.
Robert Kadar
CEO
Good Health Advertising Inc
www.GoodHealthAdvertising.com

Sean X
Sean X September 12, 2008 at 12:56 PM

I am not debating that banners are now a standard. I was around when there were not even standardized sizes for banners... that truly sucked. The IAB at least was able to get that.

It's just a crappy standard. It was created before we understood the medium by people, well, like me unfortunately. WIRED was the first site I saw one on. I remember when in '96 we were still saying how great the internet was... no advertising... the dissemination of content, ideas, thoughts, the democratization of information. And I was IN advertising. We were going to change the world.

We created that standard because a lot of us were working in traditional. It made sense, an online billboard. We didn't understand at that time the difference between passive consumption while driving, and active information seeking. How could we, it was totally radical from anything we knew. A ever growing massive Hypercard stack.

Like our own Democracy, the promise of the Internet has, over the last 13 years, changed. The illusion of freedom under a controlled system of power. I am continually impressed with Craig's List. A site that could made millions, if not billions if it was controlled by someone else. But for them, enough money it seems, is enough. They have replaced almost an entire model of classified advertising in newspapers with something, that is, essentially, free. Is that good? I do not really know, but it seeks to change the model. Evolve.

It's that after the implosion we stopped creating true innovation in advertising online. Standards actually preclude that in a way. They stifle innovation by locking us all into systems. It is a symbiotic relationship. We need those standards to grow fast, we need them to create a harmony of navigation. Without them we are chaos. But in the chaos emerges radical ideas.

We are now a real industry. With real jobs. Real titles. Real companies. Luckily many of us still get away from having to wear "real" business attire ;)

The societal impacts of what we do are profound. Let's seek to do them with a little more aesthetic.

Can we create an ad format that benefits the consumer and does not just seek to pound them into the pavement with mass attack? I do not know, but we should at least still step back once and awhile and try.

ranty rant signing off...

Robert Kadar
Robert Kadar September 12, 2008 at 9:15 AM

Two things here -- banners work because they representation standardization and no industry can exist without standards. They are easily deployable, trackable and affordable.

The other point "ad networks" or "rep firms" exist in all media - TV, Radio, Print, Outdoor, Yellow Pages, etc. So it's totally logical that online advertising networks exist to serve an increasingly fragmented marketplace.

Robert Kadar
CEO
Good Health Advertising Inc.
www.GoodHealthAdvertising.com

Hibben Silvo
Hibben Silvo September 9, 2008 at 11:50 AM

I believe that you are not alone in your views and many are concerned with the future of online advertising in the hands of ad networks. However, it is your exact concerns that the company I work for, Adcision Luxury Media, was built around. We have found that more and more brands are embracing targeted networks like Adcision to broaden their reach. We are an online luxury ad network and publisher representation firm that offers transparency to both our advertisers and publishers. We are always seeking opportunities for 'out of the box' advertising for our clients. For an example of a creative campaign running on one of our publishers, see the page overlay currently running from Leading Hotels of The World on www.fivestaralliance.com

Joseph Raben
Joseph Raben September 9, 2008 at 11:23 AM

Your negative comments on banner advertising suggest that it would be advantageous to move beyond the mere transference of a type of communication devised for television and take more advantage of the Web's cap- acity for interaction. In particular, an effective advertising message should draw the potential customer to an activ- ity that she/he enjoys and should include the promotion within the activity itself. I have developed an interactive online word puzzle that has already proven highly attrac- tive in a print version, and that would be particularly use- ful in marketing products and services--like books and cruises--to older women, who have leisure time and disposable income. Can you help me with it?