In Focus

4 obstacles limiting growth in display

Introduction

A recent Wall Street Journal article painted a somewhat sad picture for online display advertising. The piece referred to display ads as "stodgy and ineffective," while highlighting the marketplace's enthusiasm for search ads. While display has definitely received much less ad industry buzz when compared with search, it does represent a viable channel that can produce results superior to both offline advertising and search. And given what is going on with the U.S. economy, its accountability cannot be ignored.

Truth be told, display is experiencing something of a renaissance. Advertisers are investing in programs as success measurement becomes more sophisticated and programs become more accountable. But the growth of digital display is being held back. Growth could be much stronger.

The dam that is holding back the floodwaters is constructed entirely out of uncertainty. Not uncertainty with respect to whether the medium should be a part of the mix. Rather, the questions circulate endlessly around what role digital display should play in the marketing mix and how much should be spent in the channel. To answer those questions, the industry needs to develop a series of tools that will open the floodgates. Here's where we need help:

  • Reach, frequency and GRP forecasting
  • Purchase data for measurement purposes
  • Planning tools
  • Dynamic inventory
 

Comments

Reid Carr
Reid Carr October 15, 2008 at 2:39 PM

I actually think that a major barrier to the growth will be two points both related to search:

The economy will push more advertisers into direct-response and pay-for-performance tactics where they can more quickly see a one-to-one connection to ROI. Search and affiliate programs take the lion's share of this.

The other point is that many advertisers, if not most, haven't maximized their position and tactics in search. So, of the budget - which is currently dwindling - they're going to spend, most of it on search tactics until they've reached the point of diminishing returns. That moves display down the priority list.

Now, I am not advocating that it should be this way -- an all or nothing approach -- I just think that these are the new barriers of today.

James Sandoval
James Sandoval October 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM

Hi Tom,

As always, very nicely written piece stuffed with some great ideas.

Regarding your statement: "If we can marry online and offline purchase data to a significant number of non-personally identifiable user cookies, we have the basis for a measurement system that blows away everything that came before it.", I agree. And it's totally do-able. The Berlin-based predictive targeting technology firm, Nugg.ad, recently sealed a deal to integrate Nielsen Homescan data with Nugg.ad customers' ad serving and/or web site consumption data for predictive targeting and advanced reporting. Finally, advertisers and their agencies can take meaningful steps forward in their quest to target online advertising more precisely and report on it more, let's say, richly; moving away from flat cookie/event based campaign and web site performance information, to actionable consumer insights. Full disclosure: I'm retained by Nugg.ad to provide UK go-to-market strategic guidance.

Sanjay Vasudeva
Sanjay Vasudeva October 15, 2008 at 8:48 AM

I completely agree here that we need to use the same metrics which are used by Media Planners for TV,Print and Radio. Infact to my mind the whole Digital Agencies concept is one which is the biggest impediment to Internet Disply growth. The problem lies in the fact that Strategic Media Planner who is doing the Annual Media strategy for a Brand doesnt do it only for Internet as he is not a specialist and more often Internet get ignored or is not given due importance at the stategic Media Planning level. Hence its important to develope metrics which make Internet understandable to Traditional Media Planners.
I guess the media planner can be explained that An ad on internet has much better chances of OTS than a print or TV ad. Because the ad on internet is delivered only when the page on which it is scheduled by the advertsier is called by the browser, whereas an ad given in the Newspaper/Magazine may be skipped if the reader deosnot go to that section. and TV ads would run irrespective of whether the program is on or if TV is switched off.