In Focus

Branding without brands: 3 success stories

Introduction

All successful brands tell a story. Apple tells us a story about people who "think different." Pepsi tells us the tale of a new generation and Disney tells a story about imagination and childhood. These are classic American brand stories -- cultivated through traditional channels and originated (to a large degree) by the brands themselves.

This is the way the world used to work. There is, however, a new world order when it comes to brand storytelling.

The notion that brand managers ever had total control over how their brands were perceived is a farce. Still, there was a time when brand managers had a greater degree of control. The rise of social computing and other emerging channels has led to the origination of brand lore in the most unlikely places. "Dell Hell" was not a story cooked up in the offices of Dell -- it originated on a blog. On the flip side, tales of remarkable yet atypical customer service performed by Zappos employees would have been less effective if spread solely by the mouths of Zappos execs. These exceptional yarns were spun (again, to a large degree) by consumers and then amplified by mainstream media (with a little help from Zappos PR, of course).

The bottom line is that brands have less control than ever before -- but that does not make them powerless. Creative strategies can get brands in front of audiences that were previously unreachable, and in a way that could endear consumers to a brand like never before. Brands do not always have to be front and center for an initiative to have an impact. In fact, sometimes it is best if a brand is not front and center. This allows consumers to tell stories to other consumers. And at a time when consumer belief in advertising is at an all-time low, C to C marketing is essential.

This article outlines three creative interactive marketing strategies that invoke consumers to talk to other consumers about brands, with minimal interference from the brand itself.

 

Comments

Gabriel Rossi
Gabriel Rossi December 19, 2008 at 10:17 AM

Very good article Adam!

The basic principles of branding haven't changed at all with social media. In fact, they have been magnified! Therefore, although every brand should consider a digital strategy, it is vital for them to consider everything that generates and influences word of mouth. I'm talking about costumer service, speed of feedback, product quality, authenticity etc...

Yes, consumers have much more leverage than ever before. However, marketers still have more control than they often argue. By choosing the message and the media, hiring (performance), developing the products, marketers still influence decisively all the 'talk drivers'. Costumers tend to amplify their emotions on-line.


Cheers

Gabriel Rossi- Brazil

Adam Broitman
Adam Broitman December 17, 2008 at 4:09 PM

Let me start by responding to your first point, "how many people even knew that McDonalds was behind it”

I think that the key here is not how many people knew, but how deeply did it affect the people that did know. It comes back to the old, "impressions versus relationships” debate. My guess is, not that many people knew about it, but the right people knew (and the right people in this case are hard to reach), and were deeply impacted.

Your second point is about impact. My feeling is, unlike a witty 30 second spot, these efforts draw people into to something that is unforgettably valuable. So much so that, there is a feeling of gratitude towards the brand that is not achieved via a television spot. That gratitude is what lives on in people's minds, and ultimately creates a lasting association.

My hope is someone from one of these brands is listening (RichardatDell) and will step in and give us some insight.

Krista Neher
Krista Neher December 17, 2008 at 3:31 PM

Adam

Great articles with interesting examples. I have to wonder what the ROI was for these programs. For example the McDonalds program generated a lot of buzz online, however I didn't see any mention of McDonalds on any of the user generated content. While the program generated a lot of buzz I would wonder how many people even knew that McDonalds was behind it.

Many of the most entertaining TV commercials have great recall for the ad (ie. people remember the commercial because it was funny) but low brand association (people have no idea who the heck made it) and therefore don't generate sales. That being said there can potentially be equity or awareness benefits depending on the level of branding.

Intriguing article - it's great to see brands trying new things :) I'd LOVE to know what the results were on these campaigns... put my cynical mind to rest :)

- Krista