How to find your conceptual cojones

iMedia: Do you have any predictions for the industry this year?

Gleeson: If each brand isn't asking itself how to reinvent this year, then they're kind of missing what the opportunity should be... I think the best analogy for what's about to happen to advertising and marketing... is the music industry, which lost sight of being in the music business and focused on being in the music distribution and printing business. It basically was a series of companies with massive infrastructural investment in particular memory storage -- printing and distribution. And so they looked at interactive as either something to fight off or something at the fringe, but they saw their core business, effectively, as CD sales. If they had looked at their business as music and had been willing to start upfront early with: "What does that mean to us, how can we be best at the music business, not best at CD distribution?" I think they might have had a different thing.

iMedia: What are you preparing for the Brand Summit next month?

Gleeson: When I heard the topic "Bottom line or flat line," it just seemed to me that if there's a combination that I can lay on interactivity, it's a failure of our imagination. And by that, I mean I'm tired of the conversations about when media dollars will move into interactive, because that's the wrong conversation. I think the question is: How are we going to re-adjust our business models to address the possibilities that interactive enables?

There's always going to be TV, there's always going to radio, there's always going to be print, there will always be these other things, it's the way that you use them... We're going to have to break some crockery. I'm also tired of people lecturing about things that I can't change in my organization. But I think there are fundamental things that we can do, and things we need to ask of our organizations, and things that we can do to change the organizations that we can focus on.

iMedia: Finally, correct me if I'm wrong, but after taking a look at your hobbies, I get the sense you're an adrenaline junkie of sorts. How does that play into your campaigns or the ideas that you come up with? Would you say that it gives you a higher tolerance for untested waters or are you more of a safety-first kind of guy?

Gleeson: I'd flip it around slightly and say I have a pretty high energy level, which I think you need to have to keep up with what's happening. And I think if I didn't have that, it would be enormously difficult for me to distill -- and I'm not saying that I'm doing the best job in the world. What it gives me is a healthy dose of "I don't know the answer." If you think you know the answer when you drive a motorcycle or you rock climb, you die... It comes down to whether you're able to re-adjust your mental map on the fly, or do you stick to the one that you know?

2008 was also the perfect storm of financial contraction, with clients looking to streamline services, and agencies being asked to do more than they ever did. Our maps don't work anymore, and if we try to look at 2009 as the next logical step of 2008, then we blew it.

Editor's note: Renny Gleeson will be keynoting on Feb. 10 at the iMedia Brand Summit in Coconut Point, Fla. For more information, please visit our site.

<< Previous page

Matt Kapko is deputy editor for iMedia Connection.

 

Comments

Rick Gardinier
Rick Gardinier January 28, 2009 at 8:30 AM

Having presented dozens of "capabilities" presentations over the years I think Gleeson's take of the 3 types of audience buckets was dead on! Love the idea of trying to work clients into the presentation although could be a challenge getting there.

Amanda Natividad
Amanda Natividad January 23, 2009 at 7:47 PM

I think my comment got lost somewhere.. (sorry about the repeat), but I love the headline. I would have liked Gleeson to expand a little more on his thoughts about the music industry focusing more on distribution and printing.

Greg Padley
Greg Padley January 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM

Wow! Nail. On. Head. Especially the "three groups" of people in various stages of gettting/not getting it.

These are exponential times --- http://5691gerg.com/?p=156

And the only comment so far is about cajones?

Matt Kapko
Matt Kapko January 23, 2009 at 12:18 PM

Hi Genia,
I felt the word represented Renny Gleeson's unique take on the space quite well and matched his remarkable energy that came out in the interview. It's also a word that he mentions in the interview. We're sorry if you were offended.

Genia S
Genia S January 23, 2009 at 9:12 AM

Did you really use the word "cojones" to talk a gender mixed group of professionals? I'm honestly shocked that your editor let you do that.