Crispin work usually elicits two types of responses: "Wow, that's ingenious! How did they get the client to do that?" or, "Wow, that sucks. They're so overrated!" I don't think any agency in recent memory has ridden this long of a hot streak and made so many in the industry guilty of "Crispin-envy." What CP+B does and does better than any other traditional agency right now is:
1. They completely "get" interactive
2. They completely "get" the 18-24 male demographic
Any agency would be envious of the publicity CP+B's work for BK generates, and when SNL is doing a spoof of your campaign (Whopper Virgins), then you know you've hit a cultural nerve center bull's-eye. Whopper Virgins is not completely interactive, but it goes outside the norm of conventional advertising for brands that are trying to be viral. This campaign is funny (first and foremost) and viral as a result.
I am on the fence, though, on Whopper Sacrifice. Though it is an engaging use of the Facebook Application platform, it does beg a question of where privacy begins and ends on the network. The idea is great -- sacrifice your friends for a free Whopper -- but the notification of that sacrifice across one's newsfeed is another matter altogether. Would the campaign have been as successful if friends were not notified publicly that they were sacrificed? No one will ever know, as Facebook and BK have agreed to end the campaign.
I forgot to add one final thing to what CP+B does better than any agency right now. It completely "gets" how to sell clients on high-risk/high-reward ideas and campaigns that most brands will dismiss right off the bat. That's the secret to its success, along with Jeff Benjamin, CP+B's head of interactive. Jeff -- here's your shout-out. :-)
-- Matt Szymczyk, CEO, Zugara
Crispin Porter + Bogusky has once again mastered the art of using relatively simple ideas to create memorable, controversial, and effective campaigns that have completely destroyed the mold as to what advertising can and should be.
CP+B relied on a tried and true strategy to promote the Whopper: the taste test. Only, how can you have a true taste test when the burger consumption market is saturated with marketing and product recognition? Enter the Whopper Virgins.
The habitually disgruntled ad world wasted no time proclaiming Burger King to be ignorant, offensive, and exploitative. However, I am not nearly as cantankerous as my colleagues. Seeing this campaign next to its inferior fast food brethren makes it hard for me to argue that Whopper Virgins is anything but a strong conceptual idea with some exceptional flaws. I can't deny that dogsledding in a grill and delivering the meat in via chopper is a bit preposterous. Yet despite the mixed reactions to Whopper Virgins, it is the Whopper Sacrifice application that is the most sadistic, smartest, and best of them all. It asked a simple question: "Who would you sacrifice a Facebook friendship with to get a free Whopper?" Easy to comprehend and use, it was immediately passed around among my friends. I actually received an email from someone before he sacrificed me. I thought, "That's nice. Too bad I didn't do the same before I canned him." Unfortunately, the application violated Facebook privacy rights and has since been dismantled. It's a shame, because I have a feeling they would have given away quite a few Whoppers and caused a number of irreparable rifts before all was said and done.
Whatever you may think, the real winning aspect of both Virgin and its predecessor from 2007, Whopper Freakout, is that they don't rely on the 30-second spot to be the primary content, but rather use it to drive people to a longer, more fulfilling brand experience. The commercials are compelling enough to bring you there and the content is appealing enough to keep you there. It is an excellent example of the power of branded content online and reaching audience where they live regardless of medium.
CP+B's goal wasn't just to show a taste test or build an app, it was to sell burgers any way possible: push buttons, get noticed, and get people thinking about where they eat. It created debate, was parodied on SNL and pushed its client into mainstream popular culture. It's hard to debate that 2008 was marketing's "year of the Whopper."
-- Dan Cordella, copywriter, Agency.com