In Focus

Email campaigns that failed

Fails 2 and 3

Fail 2: Confuse me, then play me out

Culprit: IMAJ Designs

There is nothing more frustrating than receiving emails that are completely irrelevant to your interests and not having an option to opt-out of the subscription.

This email from IMAJ Designs is special -- two fails in one. I was immediately confused by the meaning of the statement "Please push your 'Picture Bar' located under the Subject Line." Using language nobody understands simply does not make sense.

The next problem was the footer, which, to paraphrase, essentially says, "This is a one-time email, there's no way to unsubscribe, and if it is not wanted, just delete it." This is the email marketing equivalent of hitting on every girl in a bar until one doesn't throw a drink in your face. IMAJ is saying, "Sorry we sent this to you, and we have zero interest in having a relationship with you. That is, unless you want to buy something now!"

Fail 3: The phantom save/co-reg handoff

Culprit: Dex

Check out this next email from Dex. It had tricky opt-out options, and why I even received it in the first place made no sense -- it is completely irrelevant. When was the last time I used a phonebook? Back in the '80s, maybe?

When I decided to opt-out, the company tried to get me to opt-in to other emails from an unknown place. The default position of the radio button selection is Dex's attempt to stop me from unsubscribing. I would not typically fault this, as it is a good idea to give people relevant options if they want to leave behind a subscription. The real question is why would a subscriber opting-out of your emails want to sign up for offers from an unknown place? Why not just let me unsubscribe if I don't find any value in this relationship and nothing new of value is being offered? The idea must be to make some money from co-registration with the yellow pages to help build its email lists. Sure, times are tough, and I can understand that companies want to keep email addresses that might be valuable to them -- but this could have been executed much better.

 

Comments

Andrea Mocchi
Andrea Mocchi July 8, 2009 at 8:33 AM

Hi Dylan,

very useful article. Analyzing emails and showing mistakes is useful not to make the same mistakes!

I'd got a question for you: you say (concerning Fail 9, Technorati)
"As I read through it more, it seemed to be a straight marketing message. The problem is this email was disguised as a transactional email and didn't have the CAN-SPAM compliance in the message."

Reading this, I can argue that transactional emails do not need an explicit CAN-SPAM compliance, isn'it? And only explicit makerkting emails need.. I am italian, I am sorry but I don't know how CAN-SPAM works..

Thank you very much!

Kevin Sonoff
Kevin Sonoff July 6, 2009 at 7:10 PM

I've always believed that the key to successful email campaigns is solicit feedback from your recipients. Put in place a mechanism that allows them to easily submit suggestions and ideas to help make the next email correspondence even more relevant to their needs.

Kevin Sonoff
Founder, Digital Marketing Buzz
http://www.digitalmarketingbuzz.com

Anthony Green
Anthony Green July 6, 2009 at 9:35 AM

Great article Dylan. You picked some (not so) great examples. I particularly liked the Constant Contact entry - ESP's should be LEADING the best practice!!

Cheers.