In Focus

How to measure your social media campaign's impact

The social media difference

At this stage of development, social media advertising lacks the standard metrics that have served as a primary advantage for online advertising. Online advertising as a form of direct-response advertising has measurability built into its very existence. Advertisers can measure reach (the number of people exposed to the message) and frequency (the average number of times someone is exposed), and analyze site stickiness (the ability of a site to draw repeat visits and to keep people on a site) and the relative pull of creative presentations (a comparison of the ability for different creative executions to generate response). They can also monitor click-throughs (the number of people exposed who click on an online ad or link), sales conversions (the number of people who click through who then purchase product), and view-throughs (the number of people who are exposed and do not click through but later visit the brand's website). These metrics are applicable to the use of display advertising in social spaces. If L'Oreal buys display ads on Facebook, all of these metrics are available to gauge effectiveness.

However, for the more innovative approaches available, metrics like number of unique visitors, page views, frequency of visits, average visit length, and click-through rates are either totally inappropriate or irrelevant, or simply fail to capture information about the objectives of a social media advertising campaign. Our tendency is to count -- count impressions, visitors, friends, posts, players. There is still a place for numbers in the social media arena, but the numbers may be different from the ones marketers have traditionally used -- and they may not be effective if not combined with more qualitative data.

 

Comments

Gunther Sonnenfeld
Gunther Sonnenfeld September 9, 2009 at 6:12 PM

To Tom's point, it's nice to look at this from an "outcome" perspective, and this article definitely provides a great roadmap for measuring impact. That said, regarding benchmarks, we still face significant challenges with things like offline activation, and it's difficult to create social media values for more traditional baselines simply because we don't have enough historical data. The key will be to work closely with researchers of all types to develop new standards of measurement.

Tom Garrett
Tom Garrett September 9, 2009 at 1:16 PM

I appreciate this effort to move the discussion of measurement away from simply counting OUTPUTS. In order for marketers to convince clients of the need for appropriate investments in social media channels, we are going to have to be dedicated to OUTCOMES that advance our clients strategic business goals, and not be content with expedient counts of "friends" or "fans" -- all of that is reminiscent of the early days of websites when the measurement statistic of choice was "hits." It didn't take clever website developers long to figure out ways to spike that number or for marketers to use the false metric as proof of success. Ultimately, clients caught on and the seeds of distrust were sown.

The more we can stick to outcomes that are meaningful to our clients' business, the more our services will be valued and desired.