In Focus

10 mind-blowing microsites

Sprint and Taser

Sprint Now

Fascinating. If you only click on one of the links in this article, click on this one. I had been there for what seemed like 20 seconds when I noticed the timer -- five minutes and 14 seconds and counting. That's an impressive statistic for a brand's main website. And it's absolutely off the charts for what amounts to a single page -- very clever.

Taser

Who knew that a weapon of serious personal injury (or should that be restraint?) could be so desirable? This microsite has one of the only intro videos that I have sat through -- and I did it twice! I can now tell you a lot about the new Taser X3. The microsite makes awesome use of video and, again, great use of Papervison3D.

My only problem with the site is not really the site's problem, but more of an endemic one related to the de-sensitivity regarding weapons; the site does not explain that carrying this thing requires great responsibility. A toy it is not.

 

Comments

Barbara Coll
Barbara Coll October 13, 2009 at 11:52 AM

Fred, this is an excellent article to show the value of 'fragmenting' corporate content. I think it is a good thing. I blogged your article with a few comments about the Search Engine Marketing aspects of microsites. Summarized here:

"If you look at from the Search point of view: it gives you a targeted destination for converting keywords, it provides more content associated with your brand that you control, and the sites may get you another place on the coveted first page of results. On the down side: many developers of microsites do not design them in a search friendly way, they don't tend to be linked into the rest of the world, and rarely do they have enough text-based content. If I were developing a microsite and would like it to be visible in search results, I would make sure it was search friendly."

Fred Brown
Fred Brown September 23, 2009 at 6:39 PM

Thanks for your comment, Kathryn. I completely take your point, and think that 'Great sites on a budget of $10k or less' would make an interesting article in its own right - I will suggest it to the editor. As Last Exit didn't create any of the sites referenced I don't know the budgets involved, but I think it fair to say that they would have cost relatively less than the main sites for the brands featured.

Fred Brown
Fred Brown September 23, 2009 at 6:38 PM

Hi Cyhyoung Park. Apologies in advance if any of these are attributed in error, but so far as I know... both VW sites were by Tribal DDB, Sprint Now was by Goodby, Silverstein & Partners. Taser was by Your Majesty, the Economist was led by AMV BBDO, Red Bull by Less Rain, Nokia by FarFar, Waterlife by Jam3 Media, Philips by Struck Creative and Mini by Glue London. If any reader knows different please let me know and I will be pleased to make a correction.

Fred Brown
Fred Brown September 23, 2009 at 6:38 PM

Thanks Damir - I love your analogy!

Kathryn Klein
Kathryn Klein September 23, 2009 at 1:22 PM

"Not only are budgets for microsites smaller than for a main site, but they can be set against and individual product or service marketing budget much more effectively." I think it is misleading to tell most advertisers that budgets for microsites are "smaller" and then to show microsites which clearly have budgets that by far exceed the budgets for most advertisers main sites. There is not one of these 10 microsite examples that has a budget even close to what many, many advertisers have for their entire web and/or overall marketing budget. Show us some great sites on a budget of $10K or less.

Damir Saracevic
Damir Saracevic September 23, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Fred, great article! Another anology I have used in the past is one of the catalog and a sell sheet. Think of your corporate website as a catalog and a microsite as a sell sheet and it definitly resonates with the clients.

CyHyoung Park
CyHyoung Park September 23, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Fred, do you have names of agencies that worked on some of these microsites?