How to really measure engagement

  • 3 of 3
  • next
  • Sign in for single page

Four tips for measuring engagement

In addition to creating custom KPIs that leverage user data into an understanding of user engagement, here are four additional things to consider:

Goals and objectives
Rather than focusing on overall sales or conversions, focus on the goals and objectives of the website. In order to translate analytics into engagement, it's important to interpret them in light of the purpose of the site: Who are you serving and what do they need or want? At the end of the day, your engagement analytics should help you make informed decisions on what and how to improve your site.

User experience
Always think about your users. Remember that people come to your website for different reasons. Consider what actions your users are likely to take while researching, purchasing, and even post-purchase. Understanding your users' goals will help you deliver a better user experience in addition to understanding which actions are most valuable to measuring engagement.

Segment appropriately
Creating KPIs and custom measurements is a good first step to understanding engagement, but in order to get to the core of what your users are doing, make sure you group those users accordingly. Which users are you targeting? Who do you want to know more about? Some metrics have built in segments, but sub-segments and geo-segments may provide more insight into your overall business goals.

Get social
Integrating social sharing, print, and email tracking into your site isn't just important for user experience, but it is important for understanding engagement. Social sharing by your users broadcast to their massive social networks is incredibly important for word-of-mouth marketing. But even more important than that, integrating social sharing provides key engagement insights. Which content motivated your users to share and how did they reach that content? Understanding this about your users could be potentially more significant than the social networks they reach.

Developing meaningful engagement metrics for your site, while easier than it used to be, is still quite a task. And although it's easy to overlook engagement metrics when your analytics team can rely on harder numbers like sales or lead conversions, engagement is still relevant to every brand. What your non-purchasers are doing may provide more valuable insights for your brand than what your most loyal customers are doing on your site. Challenge yourself to look beyond traditional metrics to understand how your visitors are -- or aren't -- engaging.

Nicole Rawski is analytics manager for Digitaria

On Twitter? Follow iMedia Connection at @iMediaTweet.

"Bar graph blueprint" and "Men handshaking stock" images via Shutterstock

 

Comments

Marielle Hanke
Marielle Hanke June 18, 2012 at 6:43 PM

The article outlines some great practices on website engagement, but from its title I was hoping it would concentrate more on how we can successfully measure ad engagement online. The ad industry is working very hard to ensure 'viewability' of display ads but is this enough? The mere fact that display ads are in a viewable position on a page does not guarantee that it was actually seen or more importantly interacted with. -MH @cloudninemedia

Brant Emery
Brant Emery June 16, 2012 at 10:13 AM

I wish we could reply to individual comments and create more of an open discussion!

But replying to Dan and in a way to Blaine, I count sharing as a part of brand referrals. Referrals these days, thanks to online and SM, has evolved to much more than direct word of mouth, or speaker-listener relationships. Sharing is referral. If you can inspire or trigger people to share your brand / content - they are adding value to that brand through direct validation within their networks. WOM is still the most prized of referral, but there are many other layers to delivering this influence today.

Brenton Murray
Brenton Murray June 15, 2012 at 9:46 PM

Good read. Really, the key to justifying any effort is measurable return. Well, unless you prefer the old "throw money at it and cross your fingers" technique.

The web has spoon-fed marketers our KPI's for so long, that it seems like many have forgotten how to measure the fuzzy data. There are so many dimensions of measurement that go beyond click-through and goal conversions. However, finding them often requires us to step back and really examine the situation from a holistic standpoint.

It blows my mind that there hasn't been more innovation in quantifying engagement in general. With the plethora of mediums, creating new forms of measurement seems ripe for the picking. I guess the million dollar question, though, is "how".

Cheers,
-Brenton
Snooozy.com

Blaine Millet
Blaine Millet June 15, 2012 at 2:48 PM

Nice article - more depth than most. I completely agree that there needs to be some level of "measurement" and "goals and objectives" set up front - we call this "STRATEGY" in my world - determining what we want to accomplish. Without this, it's a constantly moving target and one you won't hit most the time.

One area I don't think you really addressed that in my world as a Social Engagement Strategist is critical is the concept of "sharing". You briefly mentioned it but it deserves far more that a mention in my mind for the reader. Without "Engagement" and then "Sharing" you are simply "promoting and broadcasting" to your audience. Getting them to move to the much bigger step of "Sharing" this with their audience is worth 10X of someone just "checking you out" and leaving. It is also very measurable and something you can follow. In addition, if someone shares, it really means they have engaged far deeper than the number of visits, page views or clicks.

The ultimate goal in all this from a social media perspective is if you are creating or feeding "Word-of-Mouth" with your audience. If someone finds your content so valuable they want to "tell others" - even beyond sharing, then you really hit the home run. Word-of-Mouth is the holy grail of any company because it carries with it such high value and credibility and helps lower their own cost of sale. Achieving this goal should be the real focus for "engagement" - at least from my experience. Hope this helps add to your article - thanks for "sharing" it with us...

Blaine

Dan Green
Dan Green June 15, 2012 at 12:49 PM

Yes indeed a great article-thank you. I guess I am reading this differently and just want to make sure I am understanding what Brant mentioned about defining engagement, which has been done in so many slippery ways. So thanks for this Brandt.

What I am understanding in this article, and what we do, is define what engagement is for particular content. I would consider sharing participation, thus engagement, by any definition, as I would one opening an email, clicking through and then depending on what is being asked (purchase, download, comment).

This seems to be what Nicole is saying-define this and measure it. Am I missing something? That has happened.

Thanks again to both of you,
Dan

Brant Emery
Brant Emery June 15, 2012 at 12:27 PM

A great article, but flawed in one fundamental way, without a clear description and definition of what ''engagement" actually is, the article basically just describes advanced interaction metrics.

Engagement is about going beyond interaction to shared creation, shared development of the brand through inspired brand participation, usually identified through four key areas: Participation (e.g. local check-ins), Content Creation (user gen), Customer Ratings, or Referrals / Recommendations. All definable areas of consumer engagement that generate real value for the brand. With advent of social media, all these behaviours can be stimulated, measured and amplified. A boon for brands that do it the right way.

-Brant, bran(d)t, rentabrant.com