In online advertising's infancy, many publishers ran what we now call "native ad formats." At the time, "ad format" referred solely to dimensions, as ads were either GIFs or JPGs. As publishers multiplied, the number of formats increased, and ad agencies started crying foul. They couldn't keep up with creating the seemingly countless sizes needed for a diverse, wide-reaching media plan.
Along came the IAB and, with it, widespread adoption of new ad standards like the 728x90, 300x250, and 160x600. "Hooray," said the agencies. "Now we can just create one size, and run it everywhere!" For a short while, agencies could handle creating ads for media plans including many different sites, and things were good.
It wasn't long before the world started to change around us. Flash became the standard animation tool. The internet became faster. Smooth, high-quality video arrived, and clients demanded it. Wires were dismissed. The mobile web became a reality. Smartphones, tablets, myriad media fragmentation, and an ever-evolving digital landscape all became standard.
Through it all, the advertising palette remained relatively unchanged. Those standards that proved so liberating more than a decade ago became handcuffs for the creative thinkers in our industry.
As data, scale, and direct response rise, creativity has taken a backseat. But there's no denying that we've seen a fair amount of innovation in the ad industry over recent years. We've learned to:
After all this wonderful evolution, where has that left our industry's ability to engage and compel customers in the eyes of most advertisers and agencies? Right where we started -- at the bottom.
The world around us is changing more rapidly than ever before. Television is fragmenting into atomic particles allowing viewers to skip advertising in real time. Tablet use is exploding, while smartphones are near ubiquitous among the audience most heavily targeted. Printed newspapers are dropping like characters in "Boardwalk Empire," as content is being accessed and shared through aggregators like Flipboard or socially via Facebook and Twitter.
How do we evolve to keep up? A few general guidelines:
We're left with a need to deliver great content alongside great advertising. But unfortunately, we're not seeing this today.
We know clean web pages are better than ones cluttered with ads. We know users are finding aggregators far more usable. Finally, we know the curve of direct response dollars has reached its zenith in its migration online. Therefore, there's major opportunity in branding and awareness. How do we capitalize on these things? We change the environment by starting with a three-point plan.
We have potential for a powerful web, where the line between editorial content and advertising isn't so black and white. It would be a web that stays consistent wherever we are -- a web that offers advertisers opportunity at impact. It would be a web with real, measurable impact.
If we do this together, the entire internet migrates into a much higher quality experience, and advertisers will migrate with it. It wasn't long ago that we adopted the standards of the IAB, and as an industry, we're in a perfect position to change the way we advertise today. It takes one major publisher to throw a stake in the ground, and the rest will follow. At that moment, we can offer advertisers the Holy Grail: the ability to both reach consumers in a meaningful way and the chance to get immediate, valuable feedback and interaction from those consumers.
Martin Betoni is vice president of creative services at Centro.
On Twitter? Follow iMedia Connection at @iMediaTweet.
"Broken lightbulb" image via Shutterstock.
Not a People Connection member?
Full Summit Calendar | Request Invite
1 9 Facebook hacks that will blow your mind
2 How fraud is disrupting the ad industry
3 The most meaningless (and hilarious) job titles on LinkedIn
4 5 marketing tools you're using too much
5 7 stupid mistakes brands make as publishers